A federal judge ruled Monday that Anthropic's use of books to train its Claude AI model constituted legal "fair use" under copyright law. According to CNBC, U.S. District Judge William Alsup found the AI training "exceedingly transformative" and comparable to "any reader aspiring to be a writer."

The ruling addresses a lawsuit filed by authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson in August. They alleged Anthropic built a "multibillion-dollar business by stealing hundreds of thousands of copyrighted books." The Amazon-backed company argued its training methods promoted creativity and scientific progress.

However, Judge Alsup ordered a trial regarding Anthropic's creation of a "central library" containing over 7 million pirated books. This portion of the case proceeds to trial in December. The judge noted that purchasing books later does not absolve liability for earlier theft.

AI Industry Faces Growing Copyright Pressure

The Anthropic decision represents one victory in an expanding legal battlefield. Reuters reports that multiple AI companies including OpenAI and Meta face similar copyright infringement claims from authors, news outlets, and content creators.

Recent court decisions have produced mixed results for AI developers. Jackson Walker reports that a Delaware federal court ruled against ROSS Intelligence in February 2025, finding their use of legal research materials constituted direct infringement rather than fair use.

The legal landscape remains complex as Ropes & Gray notes that more than 151 notable copyright suits against AI platforms are currently pending across the United States. These cases challenge both training methodologies and AI-generated outputs.

Market Implications for AI Valuations

The copyright uncertainty has not dampened investor enthusiasm for AI companies. Crunchbase reports that Anthropic recently raised $3.5 billion at a $61.5 billion valuation, tripling its worth from just one year ago when it was valued at $18.5 billion.

AI company valuations continue reaching unprecedented heights across the sector. Finro Financial Consulting analysis of 90+ AI mergers and acquisitions reveals an average revenue multiple of 25.8x, demonstrating immense investor confidence in transformative AI technologies.

The broader AI market shows remarkable growth trajectory. UNCTAD projects the global AI market will reach $4.8 trillion by 2033, establishing AI as the dominant frontier technology.

Broader Industry and Regulatory Trends

Legal experts anticipate 2025 will prove pivotal for AI copyright jurisprudence. Multiple high-profile cases involving generative AI platforms face substantive rulings in coming months. The outcomes could reshape how AI models access training materials and whether companies must license content from creators.

BakerHostetler maintains that copyright issues significantly impact the entire AI value chain, from content creators to dataset providers and downstream AI solution users.

Congressional action appears likely as lawmakers craft legislation addressing AI transparency requirements. The proposed Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act would require companies to disclose training datasets, potentially giving copyright owners greater control over their works.

Despite legal uncertainties, enterprise AI adoption accelerates. Companies with revenues exceeding $500 million are implementing AI solutions more rapidly than smaller organizations, driven by competitive pressures and operational efficiency gains.

The Anthropic ruling provides temporary clarity for one aspect of AI training, but broader questions about copyright, compensation, and consent remain unresolved. Industry observers expect continued legal volatility as courts, legislators, and regulators work to establish frameworks governing AI development and deployment.

Related Reading on Morrow Report

The Alternative Financial Systems Index provides comprehensive metrics and analysis of emerging financial systems outside traditional banking. Readers will gain quantitative insights into transaction costs, user adoption rates, and effectiveness measures across decentralized finance, community banking, microfinance, blockchain currencies, and peer-to-peer lending platforms. The index reveals that alternative systems with transaction costs below 0.5% of traditional finance achieve three times higher adoption rates, while systems offering access within minutes rather than days demonstrate 2.5 times higher user retention.