Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn’t arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks

Anthropic Settles Landmark AI Copyright Lawsuit for $1.5 Billion After Piracy Claims

George Cranston profile image
by George Cranston
Anthropic Settles Landmark AI Copyright Lawsuit for $1.5 Billion After Piracy Claims

Anthropic agreed Friday to pay $1.5 billion to settle a class-action lawsuit with authors who accused the AI company of using pirated books to train its Claude chatbot. According to The Guardian, the settlement covers approximately 500,000 books and represents the largest copyright recovery in American legal history. The company will pay roughly $3,000 per book plus interest to authors and publishers.

The lawsuit was filed by thriller novelist Andrea Bartz and nonfiction writers Charles Graeber and Kirk Wallace Johnson in 2024. They alleged Anthropic downloaded millions of copyrighted books from pirate websites Library Genesis and Pirate Library Mirror without permission. U.S. District Judge William Alsup must approve the settlement, with a hearing scheduled for Monday.

Anthropic Deputy General Counsel Aparna Sridhar said the settlement resolves remaining claims from the case. The company also agreed to destroy the original pirated book files it downloaded.

This settlement directly addresses authors' concerns about AI companies profiting from their creative work without compensation. NPR reports the case could reshape legal battles between AI firms and content creators across multiple industries.

The $3,000 per book payment represents four times the statutory damages a jury could award under copyright law. Author attorney Justin Nelson called it "the first of its kind in the AI era" and a message that using pirated content has serious consequences.

Judge Alsup ruled in June that training AI models on legally obtained books constitutes fair use. However, he found Anthropic liable for downloading over seven million pirated books from shadow libraries. This distinction means AI companies can train on copyrighted material if acquired legally.

The settlement creates a business precedent that could reshape how AI companies acquire training data going forward. MIT Technology Review notes dozens of similar lawsuits against major AI players including OpenAI, Microsoft, Meta, and Google remain pending in courts.

Legal experts expect other AI companies to face similar financial pressure to settle copyright claims. The $1.5 billion figure could serve as an anchor for future negotiations between AI developers and content creators. Meta faces parallel allegations involving pirated books for training its LLaMA models.

Cornell Law Professor James Grimmelmann told Fortune the settlement establishes that AI companies must acquire training data legitimately. However, it leaves other copyright questions around AI development unresolved. Smaller AI companies may struggle with similar settlement amounts, potentially consolidating the industry around well-funded players.

The settlement arrives as Anthropic expects $5 billion in sales this year while remaining unprofitable. The company recently raised significant funding, making the settlement financially manageable despite its record size.

Further Reading

For deeper insights into global adoption trends, our Alternative Financial Systems Index tracks regulatory frameworks and adoption metrics across 50 countries. The index provides comprehensive analysis of how different jurisdictions approach emerging technologies and their regulatory implications.

George Cranston profile image
by George Cranston

Read More